Wind turbine · 2026
71
Lordsburg, NM · near Lordsburg Muni (14.8 mi)
What this outcome means
No determination is recorded on this case in the FAA's published archive. Cases still under study show no determination until the aeronautical study closes.
The proposal, in the filer's words
"Proposed utility scale wind project"
Filing details
- Case number (ASN)
- 2026-WTW-309-OE
- Structure
- 71
- Type
- Windmill
- Category
- Wind turbine
- Height above ground
- 698 ft
- Height above sea level
- 5,481 ft
- Site elevation
- 4,783 ft
- Notice of
- New Construction
- Duration
- Permanent
- Marking & lighting
- —
Timeline
- Filed
- January 6, 2026
- Determined
- —
- Determination expires
- —
Who filed it
- Sponsor
- Silver Stallion
- Representative
- EDF Renewables
Names are shown as they appear in the FAA's public record. How we handle names
Location
- Coordinates
- 32.297006, -108.443250
- Degrees / minutes / seconds
- 32°17'49.2"N 108°26'35.7"W
- County
- Grant
- Open in a map
- Google MapsOpenStreetMap
See every 2026 filing near Lordsburg Muni →
About this record
This page is a readable copy of a public record published by the FAA's Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis system. It is not the official record and may lag it. For the authoritative case status, search this ASN at the FAA's OE/AAA portal. If something here is wrong, email support@idea-engine.studio and we will correct it.
Source: FAA Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) public archive (oeaaa.faa.gov), data as of September 12, 2026. Compiled by LOS Analyzer (Idea Engine LLC). This is not an official FAA record or an FAA determination; the FAA's portal is authoritative. LOS Analyzer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA.
Screening a structure of your own?
Check Part 77 and the tower's line of sight before you file
LOS Analyzer screens a proposed structure against FAA Part 77 surfaces and the control tower's sightline to the runway, terrain-aware, in minutes. It is a preliminary screening — not an FAA determination and not a substitute for a licensed engineering review.