Building · 2026
Goldin Site
DeKalb, IL · near De Kalb Taylor Muni (2.4 mi)
What this outcome means
An interim result issued while the aeronautical study continues. It is not the final determination.
The proposal, in the filer's words
"Construction of industrial use building"
Filing details
- Case number (ASN)
- 2026-AGL-7162-OE
- Structure
- Goldin Site
- Type
- Building
- Category
- Building
- Height above ground
- 140 ft
- Height above sea level
- 1,041 ft
- Site elevation
- 901 ft
- Notice of
- New Construction
- Duration
- Permanent
- Marking & lighting
- —
Timeline
- Filed
- May 11, 2026
- Determined
- —
- Determination expires
- —
Who filed it
- Sponsor
- Karis
- Representative
- Kristen Bruns
Names are shown as they appear in the FAA's public record. How we handle names
Location
- Coordinates
- 41.900284, -88.714928
- Degrees / minutes / seconds
- 41°54'01.0"N 88°42'53.7"W
- County
- DeKalb
- Open in a map
- Google MapsOpenStreetMap
Other filings within 5 miles
Organisation-sponsored 2026 filings whose coordinates sit near this one.
About this record
This page is a readable copy of a public record published by the FAA's Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis system. It is not the official record and may lag it. For the authoritative case status, search this ASN at the FAA's OE/AAA portal. If something here is wrong, email support@idea-engine.studio and we will correct it.
Source: FAA Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) public archive (oeaaa.faa.gov), data as of September 12, 2026. Compiled by LOS Analyzer (Idea Engine LLC). This is not an official FAA record or an FAA determination; the FAA's portal is authoritative. LOS Analyzer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA.
Screening a structure of your own?
Check Part 77 and the tower's line of sight before you file
LOS Analyzer screens a proposed structure against FAA Part 77 surfaces and the control tower's sightline to the runway, terrain-aware, in minutes. It is a preliminary screening — not an FAA determination and not a substitute for a licensed engineering review.