Antenna tower · 2026
WJMN Escanaba MI
Trenary, MI · near Van Effen Field (15.9 mi)
What this outcome means
The outcome turns on marking and lighting conditions — typically obstruction lighting or paint required as a condition of the determination.
The proposal, in the filer's words
"Modify tower lighting to eliminate steady burning (L-810) side lights"
Filing details
- Case number (ASN)
- 2026-AGL-8707-OE
- Structure
- WJMN Escanaba MI
- Type
- Tower / antenna
- Category
- Antenna tower
- Height above ground
- 1,202 ft
- Height above sea level
- 2,022 ft
- Site elevation
- 820 ft
- Notice of
- Existing
- Duration
- Permanent
- Marking & lighting
- Red lights and paint
Timeline
- Filed
- June 8, 2026
- Determined
- July 22, 2026
- Determination expires
- —
Who filed it
- Sponsor
- Queen Bee's Knees LLC
- Representative
- Hatfield & Dawson Consulting Engineers
Names are shown as they appear in the FAA's public record. How we handle names
Location
- Coordinates
- 46.134722, -86.948889
- Degrees / minutes / seconds
- 46°08'05.0"N 86°56'56.0"W
- County
- Delta
- Open in a map
- Google MapsOpenStreetMap
About this record
This page is a readable copy of a public record published by the FAA's Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis system. It is not the official record and may lag it. For the authoritative case status, search this ASN at the FAA's OE/AAA portal. If something here is wrong, email support@idea-engine.studio and we will correct it.
Source: FAA Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) public archive (oeaaa.faa.gov), data as of September 12, 2026. Compiled by LOS Analyzer (Idea Engine LLC). This is not an official FAA record or an FAA determination; the FAA's portal is authoritative. LOS Analyzer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA.
Screening a structure of your own?
Check Part 77 and the tower's line of sight before you file
LOS Analyzer screens a proposed structure against FAA Part 77 surfaces and the control tower's sightline to the runway, terrain-aware, in minutes. It is a preliminary screening — not an FAA determination and not a substitute for a licensed engineering review.