Skip to content
LOS Analyzer

Antenna tower · 2026

CALCEDEAVER AL - NSB

CIRTONELLE, AL · near Mark Reynolds/North Mobile County (17.8 mi)

Marking and lightingRevision320 ft AGL

What this outcome means

The outcome turns on marking and lighting conditions — typically obstruction lighting or paint required as a condition of the determination.

The proposal, in the filer's words

"Request M/L change to Dual Med"

Filing details

Case number (ASN)
2026-ASO-5595-OE
Structure
CALCEDEAVER AL - NSB
Type
Tower / antenna
Category
Antenna tower
Height above ground
320 ft
Height above sea level
582 ft
Site elevation
262 ft
Notice of
Existing
Duration
Permanent
Marking & lighting
Dual-red and medium intensity

Timeline

Filed
March 13, 2026
Determined
March 16, 2026
Determination expires
—

Who filed it

Sponsor
Diamond Towers V LLC
Representative
Donna Parolari

Names are shown as they appear in the FAA's public record. How we handle names

See every 2026 filing by Diamond Towers V LLC →

Location

Coordinates
31.137583, -88.137417
Degrees / minutes / seconds
31°08'15.3"N 88°08'14.7"W
County
Mobile

About this record

This page is a readable copy of a public record published by the FAA's Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis system. It is not the official record and may lag it. For the authoritative case status, search this ASN at the FAA's OE/AAA portal. If something here is wrong, email support@idea-engine.studio and we will correct it.

Source: FAA Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) public archive (oeaaa.faa.gov), data as of September 12, 2026. Compiled by LOS Analyzer (Idea Engine LLC). This is not an official FAA record or an FAA determination; the FAA's portal is authoritative. LOS Analyzer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA.

Screening a structure of your own?

Check Part 77 and the tower's line of sight before you file

LOS Analyzer screens a proposed structure against FAA Part 77 surfaces and the control tower's sightline to the runway, terrain-aware, in minutes. It is a preliminary screening — not an FAA determination and not a substitute for a licensed engineering review.